Friday, December 31, 2010

Happy New Year 2011: Guy Lombardo Can Save Us

New Year's Eve any year. eechhhh!!!!! Another year gone. Nothing accomplished. Things, in fact, have probably gotten worse. They did in 2010 and most certainly 2011 will be a nightmare. And all those people on drink and drugs tooting in the new year with screeching horns and ugly hats made in China. I spent several NYEs walking the neighborhood contemplating throwing myself into oncoming traffic. One of my few NYE respites occurred when the Russians were in residence. We'd throw Russian New Year's feasts with black bread, blini, mushroom soup, beet salad, cheese, cold cuts, boiled potatoes, and ham. (The Russians did the cooking.) And lots of vodka and champagne and toasts with every round. We'd call our friends in St. Petersburg, 8 hours ahead of us, and scrape them off the floor.

The only thing that can bring New Year's Eve to its deserved glory is Guy Lombardo. Not that I was a huge fan of Guy Lombardo growing up, but when he died anything good about New Year's Eve died with him. The great Lombardo was replaced with Dick Clark (with Ryan Seacrest and the vomitrocious Jenny MacCarthy), Carson Daley--and OMG, Megan Kelly on Fox-- and a cheezy bam-bamming rock n roll blow out with fogeys, has-beens, and bands you'd normally pay to avoid. I mean, who wants to see Bono for the 177th time, or, (I'm not kidding) Rick Springfield, the Backstreet Boys and New Kids on the Block? MTV threatens to broadcast Snooki's ball drop live from Seaside, New Jersey.

On New Year's Eve I want sweet sounds and martinis. I can't help it. I grew up in fancy hotels with dance floors and orchestras. I spent countless hours in cocktail bars and nightclubs. My parents didn't have the foresight to take me to the civilized Roosevelt Grill, but for some inexplicable reason, saw nothing wrong with the (real) Latin Quarter.

So, for those who remember Guy Lombardo or those who have no idea who I'm talking about, here he is. The short guy waving and dancing with the tall woman in the first segment looks a lot like Swifty Lazar.





Here are my New Year's Resolutions:
catch up with bastard work
read all of Gore Vidal's books
be meaner to deformers






С Новым Годом всех моих друзей: моя любимая Soier, Паша, Света, Дима, Алекс, Ян, Ванесса, Влади, Свете, и Кайл. Я скучаю по тебе все.


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

In Memory of Jack Jennings Reese, My Father

My father Jack Jennings Reese died Tuesday night. He was 83. I was never supposed to know his name. I was never supposed to know him. That's what adoption means.

Jack's name was not on my original birth certificate. My "non-ID" from Toledo Crittenden helpfully informed me that my father was a man. Oh, and that he had blue eyes, was a high school drop-out, working class, and Protestant. (That last part is a stretch. I don't think he was an atheist, but he had no quarter with organized religion. He refused to be baptized.) He must have been from Akron, since that's where my mother lived.

I got that information in 1980. Not until 1996, however, did I learn in a letter from my mother, Jack's initials: JR. As in Ewing. That small slice of information was treasured. It meant, as it can only mean to the adopted, that I wasn't dropped out of a UFO or born in a cabbage patch. I wasn't an immaculate conception. I already knew I had a mother, of course, but now I had a father. In Akron. Or someplace. It turned out to be Buffalo. . My mother described Jack as "nice looking."

The following year, my mother, whose speech was impaired by a severe stroke, told me Jack's full name. But did I hear her correctly? That same night, my mother's husband, Bob, clarified what I'd heard and told me my father's name. I had misunderstood her.

I learned later from Jack that he and Bob had known each other, but not well. Both were truck drivers. Bob knew all about Jack--and me--but Jack had no idea that his old girlfriend had married Bob or that I even existed. Bob wasn't about to tell him.

One day, according to Jack, my mother just wasn't around any more. When he rang her up, her father, who never liked him, told him she went out of town to "care for a sick aunt." Really! And he believed it. He was 17. She was nearly 24! Shortly after her disappearance Jack turned 18, joined the Army, and went to post-war China with General George Marshall for a couple years while the general, under what was called The Marshall Mission, tried to broker a coalition government between the Chinese Nationalists and the Communists. It didn't work. As far as I can tell, Jack was officially part of Marshall's staff, but he seemed to spend most of his time carousing and babysitting disgraced Army officers who had been shipped off to China after the war to dry-out or de-tox. It was sort of like MASH without the gore and war.

On Fathers Day 2005 I wrote My Two Dads. Here's some of the things I said about Jack then:

Jack’s family line was poor by the time he was born. He never went beyond the 8th grade. He worked from the time he was 12 or 13 . His first job was unloading slots for a local gambler. He moved up to driving truck, which he did his entire working life with literally millions of safe driving miles....

...Jack taught himself several languages, including fluent Chinese (Mandarin? I don’t know). I once saw him hustle a 30 something Chinese woman at the Buffalo airport...Jack is a big shot in the Masons, the American Legion, the VFW, and the now defunct Veterans of China-Burma...Jack is a voracious reader. He knows everything except how to keep a checkbook. He once called me up to talk about robber barons.

...Jack was and is a New Deal Democrat. His father often warned him never bring home a Republican to darken the family door. His hero is FDR. Jack’s wife was a bigwig in the local Democratic Party and once took him to Washington to meet LBJ. Jack loathes the Bushes. He always votes a straight ticket. In China he met Mao, and had High Tea with Madame Chaing kai-chek. He says that if he’d been Chinese in 1948 he’d have been a “goddamned Communist."

Jack had lots of stories. In Nanjing, his main base of operation, he said he ran the harbor for awhile and pulled bodies out of the river. Once an old White Russian general chased him around a bakery with an ax, suspecting him of a dalliance with his young wife. Jack soundly denied this activity to the old general-- and me- saying one of his drunked up officers had done the deed. Sent to Shanghai for awhile, he helped another soldier bury stolen gold bars under the floorboards of a room at the Hotel New York. Jack didn't ask and didn't want to know where they came from. No matter what Jack said to the contrary, I have always believed that I have one or more Chinese siblings. "I'd know if I had a kid," he'd tell me. I had to remind him that he didn't know about me until 2000. "That's different." Jack promised to take me to the place of my conception, a "motor court" still in operation on the old Akron-Massillon Road. I was in Ohio and he in New York, so it never happened.

Jack knew Jimmy Hoffa and years after Hoffa's disappearance and "death," he claimed he ran into the most famous missing person in America in a hotel lobby in Honolulu. In his later years after his wife died, Jack considered himself kind of a chick magnet.

A friend, upon hearing some of Jack's stories said he sounded like Hunter S. Thompson. Oddly, as he grew older, Jack closely resembled Dr. Thompson.

I think Jack was a great man, but a difficult man. He was one of the smartest men I've ever known. He was a man's man, and I suspect a pretty tough act for my brothers to follow. Strangely, I felt from the beginning that I'd fallen right in line behind him. He had, shall I say, disdain for certain wielders of authority, though he could be quite the authoritarian himself sometimes. He took delight in being one of a two-member team who brought a bastard into the world. At a Friday night bingo game at the Amherst VFW Jack introduced me around to his fellow codgers (he was considered a youngster) as his "late in life child." One of the old timers shook my hand and chuckled, "We've been getting quite a few of them lately."

Adoptees have (at a minimum) two families. We have two sets of parents: our natural parents from whom we are separated and (single parent adoption aside), our adoptive parents, who by statue, become our new parents. I've never really differentiated the two sets except when I need to clarify who I'm talking about. Both are my parents. I have two mothers. I have two fathers. Now all of them are gone, a hard fact that makes adoption even more stressed, absurd, and dysfunctional than it is already. I was very fortunate to have 10-years with Jack, even if I wasn't the best of daughters at times. I cannot imagine what it is like to find a grave (or two) at the end of your search. I cannot imagine that we are not supposed to know where we came from, and it is painful to know that once, by law, I knew nothing. I have never forgotten the vacuum I lived in for the first 35 years of my life, not knowing a name or place or single fact about my history--not allowed to know because for some twisted reason the state didn't want me to know. Jack filled in much of that vacuum. He gave me context. I thought he'd outlive us all.

Jack is survived by his sister Patty Simmons, and his brother, the legendary Cleveland disk jockey Carl Reese. He is also survived by his sons Sam Reese, John Reese, granddaughters Crystal Reese and Jasmine Reese, grandsons Markus Reese, Jack Reese, Abe Reese, and Jahmal Reese, great grandchildren, and other extended family members. His wife Margie passed away in 1998. In 2008, my brothers Mark and Rob died within months of each other. All of Jack's sons and some of his grandsons carry his middle name, Jennings. Jack explained once that Jennings was not a family name, but that he'd been named for William Jennings Bryan.



Mark, Rob, Jack

When I first learned about Jack, before I knew him, I'd call him Black Jack, a sort of adventurer on horseback. I don't know why. After I got to know him, I continued to think of him that way, though I don't remember ever telling him his secret name. After all, he didn't have a horse. Now, I salute you Black Jack Reese. You were a hellluva a man and I'm proud to be your daughter.

NOTE: Much to my distress I have misplaced all of my pictures of Jack. I've nicked these three pictures from the Facebook pages of Crystal Reese and Marlene Smukall Masullo.



Bookmark and Share

Monday, December 27, 2010

Bastard Nation Letter to NJ Gov. Chris Christie - Please Veto S799/A1399

I'll be blogging on the current situation in New Jersey in a couple days, as well as posting a Bastard Nation Action alert regarding S799/A1399. In the meantime, here is the letter BN sent to Gov. Chris Christie asking him to veto the bill if it's hits his desk.

Governor Chris Christie
Office of the Governor
PO Box 001
Trenton, NJ 08625

PLEASE VETO S799/A1399: the Adoptees' Birthright Bill

Dear Governor Christie:

Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization, the largest adoptee civil rights organization in North America, opposes S799/A1399: The Adoptees' Birthright bill. We ask you to veto it if it comes to your desk. The bill is currently awaiting a vote on the House Floor on January 6 or 20, 2011.

If passed, this bill will permit some of New Jersey's adopted adults to receive their true and accurate original birth certificates. Others, through the compromise language of this bill, will receive only a false and mutilated certificate with the name and address of the parent(s) bureaucratically excised by the Department of Health and Senior Services by order of the birthparent(s).

Bastard Nation rejects this newly created special right of birthparents to remove their names from the birth certificates--the public record-- of their own adult offspring. No other parent has that right. Why should birthparents have different rules?

Since 1999 four states have restored to adoptees the unrestricted right to records and identity access: Oregon through ballot initiative, and Alabama. New Hampshire, and Maine through legislation. Kansas and Alaska never sealed records. New Jersey should not buck the tide. New Jersey should not pass a bill that continues to treat adoptee access to their own birth certificates as a favor, not a right--a right that the not-adopted enjoy without a second thought.

S799/A1399 is not an Adoptees' Birthright bill. It does not restore the right of unrestricted birth certificate access to New Jersey's adoptees. Instead it encodes "special rights" for some into state law where it did not exist before. Please veto this discriminatory legislation.

For the record, Bastard Nation also opposes an alternate bill (no number assigned as of this writing) introduced in the House and supported by the New Jersey ACLU, New Jersey Right to Life and other organizations opposed to the restoration of adoptee rights, which offers a favor-based system of birth certificate access.

Yours truly,



Marley Greiner
Executive Chair
Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Life's Not Fair: I'm Still Waiting for my Pony...

...and abandoned Sumatran orangutan Silvestre, 11 months, got a trans-Atlantic cruise. The Daily Mail reports that Sly had great time in his 4-bed 1st class cabin he shared with Maribel Bustiamente, his Santilla (Spain) zookeeper who was escorting him to his new home at Monkey World, an ape rescue center in Dorset. He got to meet passengers and crew and swing from table to chair to bunk ladders. The Mail reported that Silvestre was abandoned by his mother after his zoo birth. She "put him down and walked away." Since then, Silvestre has been bottlefed and cared for by zookeepers. According to Chris Jones, spokesperson for Brittany Ferries, "because Silvestre, was so young and has been separated from his mother, he had to be near his keeper all the time he was traveling."

Dr. Alison Cronin, director of Monkey World, told The Mail, "At a year old it is a perfect time for him to move in full-time with other orangutans where he can develop physically and mentally with his own kind."

Now anybody who knows me knows that I'm not into the junk science that imbues contemporary adoption. but I'm fascinated that an 11-month old orangutan gets more consideration regarding separation issues and family dysfunction than do adoptees who just get handed off for a check. Maybe zookeepers should be running adoption.

You rock Sylvestre! And if somebody offers you a pony, jump on it!



Sylvestre and Maribel Bustiamente


Bookmark and Share

Saturday, December 25, 2010

A Merry Spike Jones Christmas

I grew up with Spike Jones in the house. Even after probably a thousand listenings of Cocktails for Two, I still find it hilarious. Especially the 1945 video I've linked here.

I intended to put up All I Want for Christmas is My Two Front Teeth, but then I ran across Mommy, Won't You Buy a Baby Brother, which I'd never heard before. It's oh so appropriate for a Merry AdoptionLand Christmas.






Bookmark and Share







Friday, December 24, 2010

Last Minute Christmas Suggestions

What would you like for Christmas, little bastards and bastardettes?
I realize the hour is drawing nigh, but it's not too late to add to your loot list. To help you out, I'm posting some toy commercials from the 1950s and 1960s. I mean, that's when a lot of us were born, and since we adoptees never grow up...




There's enough here for consumer, feminist, and parent do-gooders to carp about until next year. Darcy the Cover Girl: the woman your little girl will want to be. Yikes! Images of Betty Draper dance in my head. OK, I'll fess up! At a certain point in my life, Bridgette Bardot was someone I wanted to be. I scared my mother.

The trucks are pretty cool (and loud). Interesting how cars are OK for girls to play with as long as they are for Baby Go Bye-Byeing tasks, not to bring home the bacon. Some things never change.

I like the Maverick swag from Kaiser Quilted Wrap, too, When I wasn't pretending to be BB, I was Bret Maverick. In fact, my entry into the world of literati occurred at the age of 12 when I wrote a screenplay about Bret's childhood in the middle of Oklahoma Territory or someplace, which my mother (again) tossed out as being "inappropriate." I'd been unduly influenced by Peyton Place.

We're cookin' with the Atlas Rocket. I'm sure the neighbors loved that one. I spent the evening of the July 4, 1983 shooting bottle rockets into Worthington Hills backyards. I know!

Fang Bang is for those unable to afford family therapy.

Finally, we get a peek at Bess Myerson whom I mentioned briefly in a recent NCFA blog.

I found a couple other Christmas Eve-appropriate commercials that I just couldn't resist. Here we have Mattel's Tommy Burst for budding Homeland Security agents--or psychopathic killers with a complete narrative. I bet Abu Ghraib and both Bush elections that Dick Cheney played with one.



And here's Baby Safe Haven...er, I mean Baby Secret.




So have a Merry Merry Christmas and don't let the PCers bite!

Thursday, December 23, 2010

It's Never Too Late for Krampus!

I apologize for not posting my annual Krampus blog earlier. This year we have The Story of the Christmas Krampus. You may notice a similarity between Krampus and Demon's of Adoption. It is not a coincidence.




Previous Krampi are here and here.

Monday, December 20, 2010

December 21, 2010: What, if Anything, Does this Mean?


December 21 is the Winter Solstice

December 21 is the day I was placed with my adoptive parents

December 21 is the day, decades later, my natural mother died

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Questions for the Vaughns

For background go to Adoption as a Public Event: Media Perception and the Grayson Wyrembek Case, and The Adoption Industry Does the Innuendo: The Misappropriation of Adoptee Rights and the Demonization of Ben Wyremek


******


Early Friday morning I posted the following questions on Jason and Christy Vaughn's Keeping Grayson Home webpage forum under the thread, Grayson's Abuse. These are questions I discussed earlier in my "Innuendo" blog directly below this entry:


1. What is crimelo.com? Why is not locatable through any web search?

2. Is Keeping Grayson Home a 501 (3)(c)? Does it have a tax number? If yes to both or either, under what name(s) are they incorporated? If they are not incorporated, especially KGH, who is the Fiscal Agent.

3 Why is the case being promoted as an “adopted children’s rights” case when there is no such thing as “adopted children’s right.” There is neither a right to adopt nor a right to be adopted.

4 Why is the genuine adoptee rights movement being co-opted and our language misappropriated?

I have also asked several times why, if their case is so egregious, that no adoption reform organization or pro-adoption professional or lobby group has stepped up to support them. At no time have I accused the Vaughns of "tax evasion" or other illegal acts.

So far the Vaughns have not responded, though some of their "friends" have, (all spellings from the original)

Two people claim that tax status is not my (or anyone's) business. Another referred to me as a mindless sheep who doesn't "no anything." Oh, and I am immoral, too. There's also some bad karma down the road for anyone who questions the Vaughns' actions:

there is a balance and a counter balance to life and the lack of moral foundation for so many of you who lack the basic tenant of life, compassion, it will be paid back…

This, because I reminded the poster that emotions and laws are two different things, and that any of us can claim that someone is "our child," "our spouse" or "our parent" emotionally, but that doesn't make it so legally. (These folks must love spiritual birth certificates.) For that, we learn that "law is developed by falible men and women who are conformist."

A person who supports my line of questioning has been called "trash"and told to return to her "trailor park."

I posted the following comment tonight regarding Federal Tax ID (EIN) and non-profit status explaining for a second time, why proof of non-profit status actually IS important. For everybody:

Having a tax number issued by the Federal government is proof that an organization has filed for non-profit status. Without that non-profit status, any fundraising sends up a red flag to IRS. Moreover, donors don’t send money into a black hole. Smart donors want accountability, which a tax number and non-profit status indicates. Certainly there are crooks in the non-profit field, but non-profit status protects donors to a large extent. Without it, there’s no protection.

A tax ID number is not that difficult to get, though incorporation is not finished (which takes at least a year.) Collecting (
note: I should have said soliciting) funds before a Tax ID is issued is not a smart practice. It can lead to co-mingling of funds, and if other organizations are involved in the fundraising, they can be investigated by the IRS as well, fined, and otherwise sanctioned. Most cooperating businesses or organizations demand an official tax ID approval [document}, before they donate funds, merchandise, or services. Although the IRS does not require a tax filing for organizations with less that $25,000 in the bank, they will investigate if a complaint is filed.

501(c)(3) is the most common non-profit status. It allows donors to take donations off their income tax, but limits the organization in its lobbying efforts, though some is allowed. A (c)(4) status permits organization to lobby extensively on issues (not candidates), but there is no tax deduction allowed.

If people did not care if their donations were dropping into a black hole then there would be no need for organizations like Guidestar.org. where you can download 990s and other organizational information. And there would be no need even for the Better Business Bureau.

Since someone on the KGH FB page claims the organization has non-profit status, the responsible thing to do is to prove it. One does not have to post a tax ID, but should post on appropriate resources tax status and the name under which it is filed.

I have not accused the Vaughns of anything wrong. For the protection of all, however, this needs to be addressed.

Now mother-in-law Phyllis Vaughn, who has unintentionally done more to bad rep the Vaughns, than any "enemy" could ever do intentionally, goes ballistic complaining that questions about non-profit status are meant to make the Vaughns "suffer."

I am not asking these questions--either about the denigration and misappropriation of bastards and our rights or the more practical organizational status problem--to make the Vaughns "suffer." I'm willing to give Jason Vaughn a couple days to reply to my questions. He should answer them in his own best interest.

I have been polite. I have never accused the Vaughns of any wrong-doing vis a vis fundraising, and am not into turning them in to the IRS. I went into these questions assuming at least the fundraising was being done on the up-and-up. I simply couldn't believe that their legal beagles would have it any other way. For doing so, the Vaughn's friends, supporters and Grandma Vaughn go defensive and act as if I'm trying to send them up like Al Capone. All I'm asking for is clarity.

Addenda: Just as I was going to hit the publish button, I checked back one more time on KGH. Much to my amazement, I am now designated a terrorist. Seems I'm "terrorizing the Vaughns" by asking inconvenient questions. Call out Homeland Security!

NOTE: I apologize for the wanky formatting at the top. I can't fix it.


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

The Adopton Industry Does the Innuendo: Misappropriation of Adoptee Rights and the Demonization of Ben Wyrembek

We can do the innuendo, we can dance and sing
When it's said and done, we haven't told you a thing
We all know that crap is king, give us dirty laundry
...Don Henley

Thursday night someone on Facebook pointed out that Jason and Christy Vaughn's Save Grayson! Twitter account promotes their failed attempt to adopt Grayson Wyrembek as an "adoptee rights" issue. I've been reading the Vaughn's Keeping Grayson Home webpage (KGH) and posting on its forum, but I have not seen this outrageous claim promoted there, at least in those words, though the implication is apparent. I checked "Save Grayson!" and sure enough:

Save Grayson!

@KeepGraysonHome is in His hands
Share the love. Support adopted childrens rights & best interests. Always follow back. Call US+404/482-1585. Updates here & on Facebook

The term is qualified as "adopted childrens rights." But, (1) Grayson was never adopted or even legally available for adoption and (2) the term "adoptee rights" is generally understood to mean the unequivical legal right of adopted adults to their own original birth certificates and other state records about our births and adoptions. "Adoptee rights" is not about the demand of adults to adopt a child or even about the process of adoption itself. Despite stretched Vaughn-logic, no one has a right to adopt a child and no child has a right to be adopted. When demeaning remarks by politicians and clueless editorial comments appear in the media referring to adopted adults as "children," no one but the most illiterate assumes genuine "children" are being discussed. I wasn't even sure if I'd heard the specific term "adopted childrens rights" before, so I Googled, the phrase and came up with nothing relevant.

It is vitally important to dig under the surface of this despicable case to uncover hidden agendas and a bigger picture. We cannot let "adoptee rights" be co-opted by what Baby Love Child calls "child collectors." The misappropriation of our language and co-option of our bastard rights in the midst of the Vaughn's public pity party and beg-a-thon suggests a profound ignorance of adoption or that more is going on with them and their unknown handlers than meets our already jaundiced eye. Maybe both.

******

Contact phone number: 404-482-1585. This same number is listed at the bottom of the Vaughn's KGH webpage:

This website is sponsored by Crimelo | (404) 482-1585

This number is located in Norcross, Georgia, located right next to Atlanta, the headquarters of the Vaughn's new "superlawyer," L. Lin Wood. I called the number and a recording of a woman's voice told me I'd reached the phone number of "Keeping Grayson Home" and to leave a number for a callback. Next, I used several reverse phone number sites to find the owner's name, but came up with "not found" or "anonymous. One said the phone number belongs to a cellphone. For $25.00, one site"might" locate the owner, a bribe I have not paid. Of course, there are services that let anyone set up a phone number, far away from their real location, that's accessible from their own phone, but Norcross seems more than a coincidence. Why wouldn't a hotline established for the purpose of "Keeping Grayson Home" be located in the Sellersville, Indiana area, where Jason and Christy Vaughn live?

I don't have a copy of the Vaughn's original KGH webpage, which went live as far as I can tell on October 11, 2010. The phone number, however, does not appear in any "official" post by the Vaughns until October 28, 2010 when a press release announcing Wood's retention was published--Dateline Los Angeles. Unlike every other press release I've ever read or written myself, this one flunks Press Release 101: there is no paper trail to track back to the point of origin: no contact person or organization, no letterhead, and no distributor (such as PR Newswire). Only the Norcross phone number and an email addy to KGH. The Vaughns simply published the text and other sites linked back to that page. That the press release is datelined Los Angeles and not Sellersville, suggests the handiwork of media maven and former LA County Assistant DA specializing in child sex crimes Robin Sax who has taken up the Vaughns standard. Sax is prominently featured on the front page of KGH, and her articles demonizing Grayson's father Ben Wyremek appear throughout the page. She considers Grayson "an endangered child." That Sax is quoted in the press release, pretty much clinches it.

The first "Save Grayson!" tweet appeared on November 4, 2010. I didn't see it then, but I'm guessing that the phone number was published on Twitter from the start. I don't know if the phone number was included on the original webpage. The cache is quite new, and the page isn't old enough yet to show up on the Internet Archives Wayback Machine. The phone number did not appear on promotional material for prayer vigils or the Vaughn's dinner and silent auction fundraiser at The Captain's Quarters in Harrod's Creek, Kentucky on November 28, 2010. In fact, no phone number was listed, only an email address for the event organizer.

Crimelo.com: This is listed as the "web sponsor" for the KGH webpage. As shown above, the 404 phone number is listed as its phone number, too. Google "crimelo" and "crimelo.com" and you'll get nothing relevant except a link to whois (more about that in a minute)

Hit the link on the KGH page or type the URL in to your browser and you'll get nothing. I tried Firefox, Sea Monkey, Internet Explorer, and Chrome with several search engines. Nothing comes back but a blank page with the outline of an empty box. Kind of strange for a "web sponsor" site. Then, it gets interesting.

Hit Control-U on the crimelo.com blank page, and you'll get the source code. At the very bottom of that, a Crimelo blurb:

The definitive social media location for victims, advocates, crime and justice news and discussion.

Turn down the hype. Challenge authority. Expose corruption. Keep them honest - tell your story.

Crimelo is all about people sharing the things they care about, find, think, or create.

There are no links to anything in the source code except to a login page for a Wordpress installation.

I Googled these exact quotes above and found nothing.

A whois search reveals little:

Domain name: crimelo.com

Registrant Contact:
Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Whois Agent ()

Fax:
PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
C/O crimelo.com
Bellevue, WA 98007
US

Administrative Contact:
Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Whois Agent ()
+1.4252740657
Fax: +1.4259744730
PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
C/O crimelo.com
Bellevue, WA 98007
US

Technical Contact:
Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Whois Agent ()
+1.4252740657
Fax: +1.4259744730
PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
C/O crimelo.com
Bellevue, WA 98007
US

Status: Locked

Name Servers:
ns1.ipage.com
ns2.ipage.com

Creation date: 29 Sep 2010 20:29:00
Expiration date: 29 Sep 2011 15:29:00


Except for telling us that crimelo.com is a brand new site registered on September 29, 2010, the registration information is useless in identifying the owners because it's done through the Whois Privacy Protection Service. Ownership of the Keeping Grayson Home webpage is registered through contact privacy.com. In other words, information about the owners of both is sealed from public view. Moreover, a Secretary of State search for "crimelo" (possibly a d/b/a for an unknown corporation) in Indiana, Kentucky, Georgia and California turns up nothing, as does "Keeping Grayson Home." Why is a service that proclaims itself "The definitive social media location for victims, advocates, crime and justice news and discussion" unfindable? Crime is big news. There should be more than enough courthouse whistleblowers and people unhappy with justice outcomes to satisfy even the most greedy entrepreneur.

There are very valid reasons why people, such as survivors of crime, abuse, and domestic violence want their names, contact information, and data protected by non-searchable web registration. It is about protecting your voice and maybe your life. There is nothing wrong with that. The Vaughns, however, have made their private business the public's business.

If the Vaughns were worried about privacy and Internet anonymity, they would not have promoted themselves for months with local and national media interviews and appearances, prayer vigils, fundraisers, and now a public website that includes a donation link, and an open Facebook page. If they were concerned about 3-year old Grayson's privacy
the Vaughns would not have dragged him to Good Morning America. (see KGH website for links for media coverage). Whether they intended to or not, their attempt to keep Grayson from his father has made the Vaughns both media pimps and media whores, exploiting the media and being exploited by it. The incurious and increasingly irrelevant MSM, too indolent and fat to actually dig out the facts and ask real questions, swarm and fawn over the Vaughns while the curious public tunes in for regurgitation and performance.

With cute prop Grayson, this entire performance is staged to deflect adoption agency (Adoption by Gentle Care) culpability for the Vaughn screw-up onto Ben Wyrembek, the courts, and any other scapegoat the Vaughns, et al can dig up. By singling out Ben, the bad dad, the adoption industry can continue to froth its contempt for biological fathers, who with the stroke of a pen can kibosh even the best laid "adoption plan," while they pretend to support industry-defined unnamed "real fathers" who shut up and get out, by either design or force.

Moreover, the staging diverts public attention from adoption corruption featured in the news weekly: Guatemalan baybee brokers, murdered Russian adoptees, basemented foster kids greasy thieves, crooks, pedophiles, and lamsters--and the unpleasant fight of ungrateful bastards to reclaim our rights that the industry and its cronies at the statehouse revoked. Forget it all! Adoption is about family building and bad guy Ben Wyrembek is a family wrecker.

The beauty of the Vaughn affair is that in the re-scripting of the facts, paps/adopters can be elevated to saviour status, biological parents can be vilified as con artists, and as an afterthought, pesky bastards and their "fake" adoptee rights (fake as opposed to the newfound "right to adopt/be adopted") claims can be co-opted. A distraught but clean cut, corn-fed family from Southern Indiana beats unashamed sloppy fornicators and their bitter fruits of the womb. It's class war adoption style.

As I wrote previously, adoption, traditionally a private matter, has become, over the last decade and a half, a community event which the public either reviles or revels in. While adult adoptees are denied access to their own birth certificates, passports, pensions, and liscensures, all in the name of someone else's spurious "privacy right," child adoptees, too young to understand and consent, are trotted out for public display as if they were showing at the Westminster Kennel Club. Scenes from National Adoption Day events, the mournful day when more birth certificates are sealed in the United States than any other day of the year, are flashed on TV screens and printed in newspapers, with no thought of adoptee privacy. Children at the adoption court are marketable; bastards demanding their rights aren't.

******

This brings me back to my original vexation: what's really going on? Are invisible strings pulling the Save Grayson monster campaign the Vaughns are fronting?

In this day of info overkill, narcissism, and TV ADD, without a team of ambitious and expensive professional consultants, lawyers, and PR flacks your wheat will turn to chaff. That is, your "cause" or grievance won't make it much past your personal blog and your neighbors.

The Vaughns surely can't be doing this campaign alone. Mother-in-law Phyllis Vaughn, who posts so much she must have a keyboard glued to her fingers, sends voluminous but non-sensical messages out to FB and Internet sites daily that reflect little political or media savvy. Father-in-law Ed Vaughn wants us to pray. Yet the "underground" campaign has a pushy "professional" feel to it, even if the Lin Wood press release flunked Press Release 101.

I've been at this racket for a long time, and the only thing close to it that I've seen is when the pre-Internet DeBoers took it to the streets. Sure, there are other disputed adoption cases that have rumbled along the news cycle, but the Vaughns have taken their grievances to a new level of ego banging and nuisance litigation including a recent petition to adopt Grayson AFTER custody was granted to his father. The prosecution of their case, while an individual decision on the Vaughn's part, is about bigger issues and agendas, not one little case. No doubt it's an object lesson for other dad's stripped of their rights by adoption agency slicksters. Who in their right mind wants spend tens of thousands of dollars only to be headlined like they're Bruno Hauptmann?

The secrecy of crimelo.com and webpage registration issues could mean nothing, but I think it's important. A web" sponsor" acting as hotline for a "customer" with no known other "customers," is suspicious. Are the Vaughns "crimelo" (that doesn't sound right) or is someone building a business on their backs?

What is Robin Sax, the self-described "child victim advocate" doing in the middle of this? Last month, on the Psychology Today blog, she wrote a scathing attack on the character of Ben Wyrembek and David Houston, a paralegal who has built an extenive public archive of legal documents from the case. Sax accuses Wyrembek of criminal acts, drug addiction, domestic violence, bad driving-- and potential child abuse. She postulates Wyrembek's sole reason for stopping the adoption of his son is to extract money from the Vaughns: "a bio-dad's financial plan." I met Ben last spring at the Ohio Supreme Court, and I can assure Sax that making it on the Vaughn's dime was the last thing he had on his mind. That Sax is framing Ben Wyrembek as a criminal with criminal intent against the Vaughns and his own son--in effect claiming that assertion of parental rights by unmarried fathers is a criminal act--marks out dangerous implications for "bad dads" who buck the adoption system and fight to keep their kids.

What's in it for Lin Wood, a go-to guy with a roster of high profile, upscale clients that include John and the late Patsy Ramsay, Richard Jewell, Howard K .Smith, Gary Condit, and Natalee Holloway's mother. He doesn't come cheap. He gets people on TV. He sues people. I have no idea what, if anything, Wood has done for the Vaughns so far. His name doesn't appear on any of the legal documents found in David Houston's online archive, but I suspect he'll end up, with Sax by his side on The Nancy Grace Show, pitching the Vaughns and pulling our purse strings while he sues Wyrembek for something.

The Vaughns and their handlers and others like them, hide behind legitimate privacy needs and policy. TeamVaughn has politicized what was a simple, unfortunate disputed adoption claim that should have been settled three years ago, turning it into a mediacentric adoption war. The sore loser Vaughns, who bet the bank knowing they'd lose it, now want recompense from the courts and applause from the public. The quiet winner Ben Wyrembek is defamed as a criminal.

The Vaughns pathological campaign endangers the tenuous rights of biological parents that courts and legislators have carved out in the last twenty years. You can be sure that "Grayson's Laws" will be introduced around the country next year in an attempt to abrogate those hard-won rights, and to make it more difficult than it already is, for parents to retrieve their children from the adoption mill. I thoroughly expect Jason and Christy Vaughn and their friends, lawyers, and handlers, to march into the Ohio General Assembly next year, lawsuits, petitions, pictures, and videos in hand, to convince lawmakers to "fix" the laws they are so sure the Ohio Supreme Court and other courts misread. I don't know about other states, but here in Ohio, activists and ethicists, including me, will fight back.

The Vaughn case is a stand-alone, but its tentacles reach far out into AdoptionLand, subverting the ethical and legal treatment of children and natural parents. TeamVaughn, whether the Vaughns understand it or not, is co-optiong the adoptee rights movement through misappropriation of language conflating the genuine civil rights of adopted people everywhere with the made-up "special right" of people--especially the Vaughns--who desire to adopt children to adopt them. In the fight for their special right they have turned the object of their desire into tabloid fodder and themseleves into AdoptionLand pariahs. Look for them to be nominated for the 2011 Demons of Adoption Award.

Bookmark and Share

Friday, December 10, 2010

AdoptaLeaks: Pound Pup Scores JCICS Board Minutes

I haven't had a chance to read these yet, but Niels Hoogeveen at Pound Pup Legacy has made a real score: the Minutes of all JCICS board meetings June 17, 2005-August 26, 2009.

As Niels points out, somebody forgot to shut the door. They were available through a members only page that... ummm... somebody left open.

Roelle Post has written a follow-up on interesting notations on Romania. I'm sure many more comments will come.

Watch it, Neils! Our national security thugs will be knocking on your door soon. They're not Demons of Adoption for nothin'

You are a True Bastard God!




ADDENDA: March 16, 2011: I heard from Niels over the weekend. He wants to clarify that he did not score these documents himself. Pound Pup was informed of the JCISC security leak and it was simply uploaded to the PP page. I want to reiterate, though that Pound Pup is an absolute top-notch source for those of us researching adoption.